Skincare expert reveals how to plump your pout with massage

How to plump your pout without any fillers: Skincare expert reveals special facial massage technique that will make your lips look fuller without ANY cosmetic help

  • New York-based esthetician Danna Omari shared a video on TikTok in which she revealed how to massage your lips to make them naturally fuller 
  • She says that by kneading the mouth muscle every day, you will ‘plump, tone and strengthen it’, which will make lips look bigger 
  • Danna advises that you do 30 reps of the orbicularis oris exercise every day 
  • Her video has gone viral on TikTok, racking up more than 241,000 views and more than 12,000 likes  
  • Many beauty businesses have shut down as a result of the coronavirus pandemic, leaving people unable to receive their usual treatment 
  • Here’s how to help people impacted by Covid-19

A beauty expert has revealed a genius technique for achieving fuller, plumper lips without the need for fillers – offering a brilliant alternative for anyone who is unable to receive the treatment during the pandemic, or for those who are too nervous to try it out. 

New York-based esthetician Danna Omari revealed in a viral TikTok video that you can use a special massage technique to ‘plump, tone and strengthen’ your mouth muscle – the orbicularis oris – which will in turn leave you with a fuller looking pout. 

In the clip, Danna is seen pinching her lips between her thumb and index finger, pulling them outwards to form a duck-like pout, and then ‘kneading’ the area around them with her fingers.  

All natural! A New York-based esthetician has revealed how you can plump your pout using a facial massage technique instead of getting fillers

Plump it up! Danna Omari shared a video detailing the technique on her TikTok account, explaining how to make your lips look fuller by strengthening the mouth muscle 

She slowly moves her fingers from one side of her mouth to the other, pinching her lips as she goes, before bringing both hands to the center of her pout. 

Danna then slowly slides her fingers outwards from the center to the outer corners of her mouth, maintaining a tight grip on her lips as she goes.  

‘Plump, tone, strengthen the mouth muscle!’ she wrote in the caption, while also explaining her technique in more detail. 

‘Take your thumb and index finger, gently pull and knead back and forth,’ she wrote. ‘Do this everyday to strengthen the muscle.’  

Danna warned that you should make sure your lips and face aren’t covered in any products that might make the skin slippery, explaining that you need a ‘good grip’ in order to get the best results. 

‘Make sure you don’t have too much slip so that you have a good grip,’ she wrote. 

The beauty expert advises that you do 30 reps of the exercise every day in order to achieve maximum results – and warns that anyone who has filler should avoid trying the technique no doubt because it may move the filler around and leave your lips looking lumpy and uneven.   

However, for those who are filler-free and seeking a plumper pout, Danna says the technique is the perfect alternative to the cosmetic procedure. 

Taking to the comments section, the esthetician also revealed that the technique will help to reduce the appearance of smile lines. 

The video sparked a slew of interested comments, with many users questioning whether the technique will actually work, and how long it will take for them to see results.  

One person who has tried out the massage urged other users to test it out for themselves, writing in the comments: ‘It works!’  

In another video, Danna – who specializes in facial massage techniques – reveals you can also also use a gua sha tool in order to work out your mouth muscle, while also relieving tension in the face. 

20 terrific lip products to add to your beauty arsenal

Care and attention: Dr. Pawpaw Scrub and Nourish (left, $10), E.l.f. Cosmetics Lip Exfoliator (center, $4), Milk Makeup Melatonin Overnight Lip Mask (right, $22)

Treatment: Dr. Brandt Needles No More 3-D Lip Plumpfix (left, $39), Hourglass N° 28 Lip Treatment Oil (right, $49)

Balm brilliance: Sol de Janeiro Brazilian Kiss Cupuacu Lip Butter (left, $18), Bite Beauty Agave+ Daytime Vegan Lip Balm (center, $14), Jack Black Intense Therapy Lip Balm (right, $8)

Beefed up balms: Glow Recipe Watermelon Glow Lip Pop (left, $22), C.O. Bigelow Mentha Lip Tint (right, $7.50)

Sweet scents: Burt’s Bees Pink Grapefruit Moisturizing Lip Balm (left, $3.59), Lanolips 101 Ointment Coconutter Multi-Balm (center, $13.50), Sun Bum Watermelon Sunscreen Lip Balm SPF30 (right, $3.99)

Shine on: Kosas Wet Lip Oil Gloss (left, $27), Tower 28 ShineOn Jelly Lip Gloss (right, $14)

Plump it up: Nudestix Nude Plumping Lip Glace (left, $28), Buxom Full-On Plumping Lip Polish Gloss (center, $21), Too Faced Lip Injection Extreme Lip Plumper (right, $29)

Netral lip: Maybelline SuperStay Ink Crayon in Lead The Way (left, $7.99), Charlotte Tilbury Matte Revolution Lipstick in Pillow Talk (right, $34)

Source: Read Full Article


Royal Expert Cautions That a Prince Harry and Meghan Markle Tell-All Interview 'Would Go Down so Badly'

Since Prince Harry and Meghan, Duchess of Sussex exited the royal family, it’s been rumored that the one or both of them would do a post-exit tell-all interview. Numerous reports of an interview swirled after Prince Harry and Meghan announced their plan to step back from their royal duties, with rumors that they were in discussions to sit down with Oprah and Ellen DeGeneres to share their story.

Prince Harry and Meghan reportedly could earn $1 million for an interview

The Daily Star reported on the rumored tell-all interview, with insiders sharing that Oprah was the top pick. “Sources close to the Duchess revealed Oprah Winfrey is a favorite to quiz Meghan on her bombshell exit with Harry from ‘the Firm,’ the Daily Star noted (via Page Six).

Further, a source told Daily Star that Meghan wanted to “allow cameras to film their home and family life, and Harry is said to be giving ‘serious consideration’ to the proposal.”

“Meghan wants to donate all the money to charity — probably the NHS after the incredible efforts of all the frontline workers,” the source noted.

The insider added, “When she was part of the Royal Family,it would have been unthinkable for her to do a solo interview with anyone abouther life and how being a princess has changed her world. But now she’s verymuch her own boss and it has put her under pressure feeling that the publichave lost their ‘love’ for her and Harry ­after they took the big step of­ ­goingon their own.”

Expert cautions them not to do an interview

Not everyone thinks that the Sussexes telling all in an interview is the right move for the couple, however, despite the paycheck. Royal expert Angela Mollard shared her thoughts on the matter during the Royals podcast and believes that an interview “would go down so badly.”

“Common sense tells me that this isn’t the right thing for them to do,” Mollard shared during the podcast. “It’s been touted they would be paid $1 million, which doesn’t seem a lot, really. I know it does seem a lot, but for an interview of that magnitude…”

She continued, “If they were to sit down with Oprah, or the like… because Meghan is friends with Oprah… and to speak at all in any detail about the royal family and to do an interview, it would have to have some elements of that, about what that was like.”

“It would be car crash Prince Andrew-style interview, part two,” she added.

View this post on Instagram

As we can all feel, the world at this moment seems extraordinarily fragile. Yet we are confident that every human being has the potential and opportunity to make a difference—as seen now across the globe, in our families, our communities and those on the front line—together we can lift each other up to realise the fullness of that promise. What’s most important right now is the health and wellbeing of everyone across the globe and finding solutions for the many issues that have presented themselves as a result of this pandemic. As we all find the part we are to play in this global shift and changing of habits, we are focusing this new chapter to understand how we can best contribute. While you may not see us here, the work continues. Thank you to this community – for the support, the inspiration and the shared commitment to the good in the world. We look forward to reconnecting with you soon. You’ve been great! Until then, please take good care of yourselves, and of one another. Harry and Meghan

A post shared by The Duke and Duchess of Sussex (@sussexroyal) on

She compared the interview to Princess Diana’s tell-all

The concern is illustrated when comparing it to Princess Diana’s interview with Martin Bashir. “You have to presume that Meghan would be coming at it from the perspective of Diana’s interview. That kind of ‘I was a victim’ style,” Mollard shared.

She added, “I don’t know if she would do it that way but if she did, she would be absolutely hammered because while the public had affection for Diana because of the three in the marriage scenario with Charles and Camilla, I don’t think there is that depth of affection for Meghan. She was in the royal family for a blink before she was out of it.”

“That lack of staying power juxtaposed against what the queen’s doing, what William and Kate are doing, what Charles and Camilla are doing… I think anything that they said in an interview would go down so badly,” Mollard noted.

Source: Read Full Article

World News

Oxford expert: Coronavirus vaccine could be ready by September

Coronavirus vaccine could be ready by September with an 80% likelihood it will work, says Oxford University expert leading research team

  • Sarah Gilbert was ’80 per cent confident’ development would work by autumn
  • Last month she said she was hopeful it could be developed by the end of 2020
  • But she confirmed optimistic scenario as human trials set to begin in two weeks
  • Learn more about how to help people impacted by COVID

Sarah Gilbert said she was ’80 per cent confident’ her team’s development would work by autumn

A coronavirus vaccine could be ready by September, it was reported last night.

Sarah Gilbert, an Oxford University professor currently leading Britain’s most advanced search for a vaccine, said she was ’80 per cent confident’ her team’s development would work by autumn.

Last month she was hopeful it could be developed by the end of 2020, but has now confirmed the most optimistic scenario after human trials look set to begin in the next fortnight.

The government has previously indicated it would fund the manufacture of millions of vaccine doses that looked promising in advance, allowing immediate availability to the public once developed.

Despite previous warnings a vaccine could take 18 months to produce, Professor Gilbert said the most bullish scenario for a working product was September ‘if everything goes perfectly’.

She told the Times: ‘I think there’s a high chance that it will work based on other things that we have done with this type of vaccine.

‘It’s not just a hunch and as every week goes by we have more data to look at. I would go for 80 percent, that’s my personal view.’

Last month she was hopeful it could be developed by the end of 2020, but has now confirmed the most optimistic scenario after human trials look set to begin in the next fortnight

Her team, one of dozens around the world working to find a vaccine, will look to trial it in a country with a high virus transmission rate in order to obtain results quickly.

Britain’s lockdown makes it harder to test a vaccine due to the virus being unable to spread, she explained.

The vaccinologist said: ‘Nobody can promise it’s going to work.’

Her team were already in talks with the government (pictured, the Prime Minister on April 2) over production to avoid any delays, however, and avoid a second infection spike in autumn 

Her team were already in talks with the government over production to avoid any delays, however, and avoid a second infection spike in autumn.

She said: ‘We don’t want to get to later this year and discover we have a highly effective vaccine and we haven’t got any vaccine to use.

‘We don’t think we need facilities built, there are facilities that can be switched over.’

Ministers have hinted that it may be worth spending tens of millions on a working vaccine to offset the economic cost of lockdown.

Source: Read Full Article


Expert reveals you should be disinfecting your bank card

GP reveals you should be disinfecting your bank card once a week because it could be contaminated with bacteria from users all touching the same reader amid coronavirus outbreak

  • Exclusive:  Dr Chike Emeagi explained it’s possible for the coronavirus to survive long enough on the flat surface of a card reader to be transferred to your card
  • Compared to touching door knobs and explained that germs can hide in the nooks and crannies of watches, rings, credit cards and bank notes
  • He recommends disinfecting your cards and jewellery once a week
  • Coronavirus symptoms: what are they and should you see a doctor?

A GP has revealed how debit and credit cards can carry microbes from those who have used the same card reader before you, including bacteria such as salmonella and E.Coli.

Former orthopaedic surgeon Dr Chike Emeagi, Medical Director of Hampstead Aesthetics Clinic and Dr Chike Clinics, told FEMAIL that while the risk is low, it is still possible for the coronavirus bacteria to survive long enough on the flat surface of a card reader to be transferred to your card. 

He explained that germs can hide in the nooks and crannies of watches, rings, credit cards and bank notes, and recommends disinfecting your cards and jewellery once a week.

Comparing credit cards to touching door knobs and handles, he suggested using disinfectant wipes to clean cards, and warm water and soap for jewellery. 

British GP Dr Chike Emeagi explained it’s possible for the coronavirus bacteria to survive long enough on the flat surface of a card reader to be transferred to your card (stock image used)

Dr Chike said: ‘I can certainly envisage a scenario where your card could be contaminated with microbes from those whom have used the exact same card reader previously. 

‘Germs can hide in nooks and crannies in objects including watches, rings, credit cards, coins and bank notes – things we ordinarily would not worry about.

‘Because of limited knowledge of this virus and how it came about extreme vigilance to hygiene is paramount.  

‘The issue is that from an infection point of view, handling a credit card is similar to touching any other surface – doorknobs, stair-rails etc.

‘Any surface has potential to harbour germs-bacteria and viruses.’ 

He explained that germs can hide in the nooks and crannies of watches, rings, credit cards and bank notes, and recommends disinfecting your cards and jewellery once a week

The World Health organisation recently released a statement describing the risk as ‘low’, adding: ‘With proper hand cleaning, the risk of being infected with the new coronavirus by touching objects, including coins, banknotes or indeed credit cards, is very low,’ World Health organisation-WHO. 

Various studies have confirmed that the virus can remain viable in the air for up to three hours, on copper for up to four hours, on cardboard up to 24 hours and on plastic and stainless steel up to 72 hours.

Dr Chike concluded: ‘This suggests the virus could live on credit cards anything from hours to days.   

‘The bacterial bugs commonly found on cards include  staphylococcus aureus, the cause of staph (skin) infections, salmonella enterica and E.Coli, a common cause of food poisoning.

‘It important to note that the possibility of catching coronavirus through your card is low but theoretical. 

‘I would recommend using soap and water or just hot water for jewellery and disinfectant wipe for credit cards – especially the cards you use regularly. 

‘The frictional force of wiping is said to be sufficient to wipe away any virus, especially with soap or chloride -based cleaners.

‘You could also wear gloves when holding your card.

‘But the main consideration is to use caution. wash your hands after handling anything that you think could be contaminated’. 

Comparing credit cards to touching door knobs and handles, he suggested using disinfectant wipes to clean cards, and warm water and soap for jewellery


Source: Read Full Article

Beauty and Fashion

Expert reveals you can leave your wet clothes in the washing machine for much longer than you'd think

WAITING for your washing machine to finish so you can immediately hang your clothes out to dry is the bane of many people's lives.

But it has been confirmed that we needn't be in so much of a rush to avoid that unpleasant smell.

An expert from the Whirlpool Institute of Fabric Science has revealed you could pretty much leave a load in all day.

They specified that wet garments can be left for a maximum of eight to 12 hours.

Indeed, Martha Stewart agrees, once telling Today that you needn't necessarily fear instant mould or stale scents.

She said: "I would say that it's perfectly all right [to leave it overnight].

If you get up in the morning and throw it in the dryer, it should probably be OK.

"I mean, don't leave it for a long time … don’t leave it for a week.

"If you get up in the morning and throw it in the dryer, it should probably be OK."

However, it's still ideal to hang your clothes up sooner rather than later if possible.

The point at which they will start to smell can depend on how often you clean your washing machine as well as the type of detergent you use, according to Pop Sugar UK.

How to clean a washing machine…according to Mrs Hinch

The cleaning star shared her step-by-step guide on Instagram…

  • Purchase a moppet sponge, which are £2 for a pack of two from Sainsbury's.
  • Give it a few sprays with Flash's bathroom cleaner.
  • Wipe the gap in between the machine and the plastic seal.
  • Then give the inner seal agood scrub.
  • Next, get a cap of cleaning crystals and a cup of white vinegar – which Sainsbury’s sells for 55p – and toss them into the drum.
  • Put all the cleaning tools you’ve been using in for a spin as well.
  • The finishing touch is to give the outside of the machine a wipe while the cycle is on.

If your laundry does give off a dodgy scent, it could be because bacteria and mould have already started to grow – and they might need to be re-washed.

It comes after an expert revealed you should never close the door of your washing machine after a wash to avoid mould and grime.

In a post on Facebook, a repair technician from Australia revealed that trapping in excess warm water after a wash can encourage them to build-up.

The handyman explained: "The first thing I tell people when I'm called out to a job is to start leaving the doors on their washing machines open when they're not using it.

The first thing I tell people when I'm called out to a job is to start leaving the doors on their washing machines open when they're not using it.

"Keeping it closed for hours and days on end can cause all sorts of problems.

"It's the mould and grime build-up, which is your biggest problem.

"A lot of people have to change the seal on their machines due to a scum and build-up and that can be largely avoided or prolonged by keeping the door open.

"Your big problem is warm water being trapped in there. If the door's closed, then bacteria and mould can breed and no-one wants that."

In other cleaning news, we told you how Mrs Hinch showed how she quickly cleans microwave food splatters using oven liners.

We also revealed that a mum has demonstrated how to scrub crayon off walls using coconut oil.

And a mum uses a £2 Wilko spray to clean mattress stained by child's bed wetting.

Source: Read Full Article


Expert reveals Prince Harry and Meghan showing 'honeymoon' affection

‘Mutually-adoring’ Meghan Markle and Prince Harry ‘announced’ they’re as in love as ever and showed off ‘honeymoon style’ affection while attending first post-Megxit event together, body language expert reveals

  • Meghan Markle, 38, wowed in Victoria Beckham dress at the Endeavour Awards  
  • Could be seen holding Prince Harry’s, 35, arm and leaning on one another inside
  • Body language expert Judi James said the couple appeared as in-love as ever
  • Said they showed ‘honeymoon style’ affection when inside as they snuggled up 
  • It is the Sussexes’ first joint official engagement since announcing step down 
  • Couple have not been seen together at royal engagement for almost two months 

The Duke and Duchess of Sussex ‘announced’ their ‘mutual happiness’ as they showed off ‘honeymoon style’ affection during their first appearance since Megxit tonight, according to a body language expert.

Meghan Markle, 38, looked gorgeous in the £950 bright turquoise gown by Victoria Beckham as she attended the awards evening at Mansion House in London alongside Prince Harry, 35, who matched her with a blue tie tonight. 

It is the couple’s first official public appearance in Britain following the Megxit crisis and prepares to step down as a senior royal. 

Body language guru Judi James claimed the couple appeared ‘like-minded’ and ‘mutually-adoring’ at the event, explaining they displayed signs they are as in love than ever as they showed off their ‘honeymoon style’ affection.  

Meghan Markle, 38, and Prince Harry, 35, showed off their ‘on-going honeymoon’ style affections while making their first joint appearance post-Megxit, a body language expert told FEMAIL 

Judi James revealed how the couple displayed ‘mirrored pinging smiles and loving intimate touch rituals’ to show their ‘like-minded and mutually-adoring’ relationship

Judi revealed how the couple used matching body language to ‘announce’ that they remain a ‘like-minded’ and loved-up couple. 

She told FEMAIL:  ‘Running the gauntlet of rain, cheers and a few boos, Harry and Meghan used a dazzling display of eye-gazing, mirrored pinging smiles and loving, intimate touch rituals to announce the fact that they are still a very like-minded and mutually-adoring couple.’

She went on to say that the Duke of Sussex seemed particularly excited at the event and overjoyed to have Meghan ‘on his arm’.  

Judi went on: ‘There was a new gloss to their simple but co-ordinated styling that hinted they’d upped their game in terms of A-list impact but Harry’s reddened, rounded cheeks and the gleam in his eyes suggested he was still excited to be arriving back with his wife on his arm.’

The Duchess of Sussex wowed fans praised by fans tonight as she made her first appearance since announcing her plan to step back from life as a senior royal (pictured with Prince Harry)

Judi explained: ‘Their pose to camera as they walked into the venue probably defined their message best.

‘Gazing into one another’s eyes they both performed twinned smiles that were wide enough to ensure we got the message in terms of their mutual happiness.’

Meanwhile, once the couple were seated inside, Prince Harry could be seen affectionately holding his wife as they sat together. 

Judi revealed: ‘Sitting together later Harry stretched one arm out across Meghan’s lap to hold her hand in that ‘on-going honeymoon’ style they were always known for.’

The Duchess appeared in high spirits as she stepped out in the vivid blue dress for this evening’s awards 

She explained: ‘Their rituals of intimate touch and intense, adoring eye-gazing are usually most common during the honeymoon period of a relationship when romantic traits are the norm. They still perform them well beyond that period.’ 

The couple will help celebrate the achievements of wounded, injured and sick servicemen and women in their first appearance since they visited Canada House before announcing their step down from royal duties. 

The Endeavour Fund supports the ambitions of men and women who use challenges to help with their physical, psychological and social recovery and rehabilitation.

Meghan’s appearance tonight is her first since announcing her plans to step back as a senior royal in January.

Last autumn, American ex-actress Meghan opened up about her struggles with royal life in an ITV documentary filmed on their Africa tour.

Once inside, Judi revealed how the couple showed off their ‘honeymoon style’ affection for one-another as they held hands lovingly 

The Duchess beamed and giggled while attending the event in Mansion House in London this evening alongside the Duke 

She said she had tried to cope with the pressures by putting on a ‘stiff upper lip’ but she was not prepared for the intensity of tabloid interest. 

Meghan was last seen with Prince Harry on an official engagement on January 7 when they visited Canada House in London to thank the nation for hosting them during their festive break in the Commonwealth country.

The following day, sixth in line Harry and former Suits star Meghan plunged the royal family into a period of turmoil when they announced they wanted to step back as senior royals and become financially independent – a move dubbed Megxit by the press.

It was eventually announced they would give up royal duties, split their time between Canada and the UK, with the majority spent in North America, no longer be known as HRHs, and their lives as working royals would end on March 31.


Source: Read Full Article


Royal Security Expert: Prince Harry, Meghan Will 'Lose Support Network'

Safety first! A lot will change once Prince Harry and Meghan Markle officially step down from their royal duties on March 31, including their royal security detail.

“Ultimately you lose the support network that is in place around both principals at the moment,” former royal protection officer Simon Morgan told Us Weekly exclusively in the latest installment of Royally Us.

As it stands now in the U.K., protection for senior royals is made up of the U.K. law enforcement, which is the police service responsible for the Royal family and within that group, the Metropolitan Police service.

“You have warranted police officers. You have the security services that all dovetail into each other to create that protection package that’s replicated on a local scale with regard to London, then a national scale within the U.K.,” Morgan explained to Us on Wednesday, February 26. “And then a global scale around global law enforcement and security services throughout the world.”

Following their part time move to Canada in January 2020, the Canadian government funded a temporary security team to assist the couple. As of March 2020 that will change.

“The Duke and Duchess of Sussex choosing to relocate to Canada on a part-time basis presented our government with a unique and unprecedented set of circumstances,” a statement from Public Safety Canada to Us on Thursday, February 27, read. “The RCMP has been engaged with officials in the U.K. from the very beginning regarding security considerations. As the duke and duchess are currently recognized as Internationally Protected Persons, Canada has an obligation to provide security assistance on an as-needed basis.”

The statement continued, “At the request of the Metropolitan Police, the RCMP has been providing assistance to the Met since the arrival of the Duke and Duchess to Canada intermittently since November 2019. The assistance will cease in the coming weeks, in keeping with their change in status.”

Buckingham Palace said on January 18 that they would not “comment on the details of security arrangements” in regard to the couple. “There are well established independent process to determine the need for publicly-funded security,” the statement read at the time.

Once the family does end their current duties for the royal family and are no longer working members, as outlined last month, there will be a security shakeup of some sort.

“You basically lose the immediate connection that [one] has if their security is no longer provided by the Metropolitan Police service,” Morgan, who worked for the royals from 2007 to 2013 added. “I do say if, because, obviously, we’re still in a bit of a flux at the moment and nobody quite knows how that’s going to look like going forward.”

No matter what the safety situation becomes once the pair’s new lives as non-royals begin — publicly funded or covered privately — Morgan said there will never be a time in which Harry, 35, and Meghan, 38, will not need some sort of protection.

“No, it is a very basic and positive answer,” he told Us about the possibility of the couple calling off all their security at some point.

Despite the fact that Harry’s mother, Princess Diana, famously decided to forgo a personal protection officer, and instead hire private security, based on the duo’s celebrity status they don’t have the same option.

“You are looking at two global icons. You’re looking at a senior member of the British royal family. You’re looking at a war veteran who completed two operational tours of Afghanistan,” Morgan pointed out. “The threat level against that particular individual is extremely high. So, therefore when you put it all together and you look at the associated risks of being a member of the royal family — the terrorist threat around that, whether it be religious or political — the single issue causes that will also look to gain some form of advantage by possibly attacking those particularly in schools, and then the fixated threat, as well.”

He added: “The threat is a real, large phenomenon certainly within the royal family and within the entertainment industry, as well. That threat isn’t going to go away.”

For access to all our exclusive celebrity videos and interviews – Subscribe on YouTube!

Source: Read Full Article