Categories
Celebrities

Meghan Markle and Prince Harry Contact the LAPD After Drones Fly over Their California Home

Duchess Meghan and Prince Harry have reported several drone incidents to the Los Angeles Police Department.

The Daily Beast revealed that the royals have contacted LAPD’s nonemergency line on a number of occasions after they spotted drones flying above their property. The publication noted, “The Daily Beast has been informed that there have been drone-related incidents at their home on May 9th, 19th, 20th, 21st, and 25th, which were all reported to the authorities.”

A source allegedly told outlet that Meghan and Harry believed the drones to be cameras, but were forced to exercise caution. “They see these drones coming in at them, and they guess that they are being operated by photographers, but they can’t just assume that. Meghan received racist death threats at the time of her wedding, so the terror threat is very real for them,” the source said.

The intrusion is extremely serious for the royals, especially as they are raising and caring for their young son, Archie Mountbatten-Windsor. As a source explained, “Imagine if you were in their shoes facing that, how that would feel? To have drones buzzing around 20 feet above your head when you are trying to play with your son?”

Source: Read Full Article

Categories
Celebrities

Meghan Markle & Prince Harry Got ‘Creative And Romantic’ With Anniversary Gifts!

Meghan Markle and Prince Harry are adding a special skill to their resumes: pro gift givers.

As you’re likely aware, the couple celebrated their second wedding anniversary on May 19, and gave each other “creative and romantic” gifts they’ll treasure for years to come in honor of the milestone!

A source spilled to People:

“They love to do their own take on traditional wedding gifts. The first anniversary was paper, and Meghan wrote out the wedding speech and had it framed for him.”

While we don’t know exactly what they gifted each other, we can only imagine it was something very special. The confidant continued:

“This year, they both gave each other gifts based on ‘cotton.’ Undoubtedly, it was a very creative and romantic gesture as all their gifts are to one another.”

Last year, the pair had just welcomed their son Archie Harrison — who was born on May 6, 2019 — into the world ahead of their first anniversary, so May is definitely a joyous month for the family of three! Obviously there isn’t much to do as social distancing continues to be observed in Los Angeles, but they enjoyed their day together nonetheless, a source previously told People:

“Today the family is spending a quiet day together.”

We’re sure that’s exactly what they wanted after a whirlwind few months!!

A friend chimed in about their “reflective” anniversary to Vanity Fair, acknowledging this period of rest is just what they needed:

“I think today they’ll be quite reflective. The last year has been pretty epic and all the changes they have lived through and gone through are huge. They’re in a new country, they’re still relatively new parents, Archie is only one. To be honest they’re only just coming up for air; they’re settling in and working on a clearer vision of what they want for the future.”

Makes total sense!

Anniversary gifts and lockdown aside, things are going well right now for Meg and Harry, which is always a great thing to hear:

“They are in a really good place. Speaking up and removing themselves from a toxic situation has enabled them to create a life they’ll be able to flourish in.”

Lets hope all of this time away to recharge means they’ll come back into the spotlight (eventually) better than ever!!

Related Posts








Source: Read Full Article

Categories
Lifestyle

Lucy Hale Has the Best Meghan Markle Story, Hands Down

What would you give to see Meghan Markle and Lucy Hale star in a TV show together? Well, on May 14, Hale revealed that almost came to be, telling Entertainment Tonight that her very first-ever television pilot also featured the Duchess of Sussex.

Hale, who now stars on The CW's Katy Keane, spoke to ET's Katie Krause over Zoom when she remembered what it was like to see Markle at a table read, even though it sounds like their encounter was pretty brief.

"I didn't realize this because none of my scenes were with her, but it was an ABC pilot. I had just moved to Los Angeles. I was like 16," the former Pretty Little Liars star said. "It was called Secrets of a Small Town, and she was in that pilot. I remember at the table read I was like, 'Oh my god, she's so beautiful,' but I don't think I ever spoke to her."

https://youtube.com/watch?v=FYw1TpSXkDI%3Fstart%3D260

This would have been around 2004 when neither Lucy Hale nor Meghan Markle was a household name. Back then, Markle was beginning to appear on shows like Century City and Cuts—several years before landing her breakthrough role as Rachel Zane on Suits in 2011.

Of course, Markle eventually became a real-life princess—okay, Duchess—when she married Prince Harry in 2018. Hale's career also took off with leading roles on Privileged and, later, starring as Aria Montgomery on the beloved teen drama Pretty Little Liars.

Hale admits she didn't really get to spend a significant amount of time with Markle, but she did joke about her "encounters" with Markle's husband Prince Harry. "I've never met Prince Harry," she said. "Only in my dreams." (Same here, Lucy.)

That specific Secrets of a Small Town pilot never ended up airing, so we'll probably never get to see what came to be of this iconic pairing. Still, it makes for a pretty cool anecdote.

Source: Read Full Article

Categories
World News

Meghan Markle and Prince Harry put up privacy screens around $18million LA mansion after realising hikers can see inside – The Sun

PRINCE Harry and Meghan Markle have put up privacy screens around their Beverly Hills mansion after realising that hikers could see into the property.

Pictures show workmen erecting the screens outside their new $18 million LA home, owned by movie producer Tyler Perry, on Saturday afternoon.




The lavish property is next to a popular hiking trail, which was reopened to the public on Saturday, May 9 following the easing of lockdown restrictions in Los Angeles County.

The trail surrounding Beverly Ridge Estates also has a steep hill which previously allowed hikers to see directly onto the property where the Duke and Duchess of Sussex are living with their one-year-old son Archie.

The couple relocated to California at the end of March following a brief stint in Canada, and are now rumoured to be living in Hollywood tycoon Tyler Perry's plush $18 million home.

They were reportedly introduced to Perry through Oprah Winfrey, who they are also working with for an exclusive new documentary series.

Perry's eight-bedroom, 12-bathroom Tuscan-style villa sits on 22 acres on the top of a hill in the ultra-exclusive Beverly Ridge Estates guard-gated community.

The property, surrounded by security cameras, has sweeping views of the city, while the star-studded neighbourhood includes Rod Stewart's mansion and Sylvester Stallone's property with a giant outdoor pool.

It is believed that the mansion is only a temporary fix as Harry and Meghan search for a new permanent residence.


Meghan, 38, and Harry, 35, have only been spotted a couple of times since their move to LA.

They volunteered for a local charity dropping off food to those who are at a high risk of catching coronavirus – as well as taking their beloved dogs out for a walk.

A source told the Mail Online: “Meghan and Harry have been extremely cautious to keep their base in LA under wraps.

“It has its own guarded gate and Tyler’s property has a gate of its own which is watched by their security team.

“They have been at this property for a month without anyone finding out.”

It comes after Prince Harry said life has "changed dramatically" for all of us during the coronavirus crisis as he marked what would have been the opening ceremony of the Invictus Games on Saturday.

The Duke of Sussex shared the video message on his Twitter account as he addressed fans from his new LA home.

Harry urged his "Invictus family" to look out for each other after the games were postponed as a result of the pandemic.

They were set to be held in The Hague, Netherlands this week but have been pushed forward to 2021 due to the spread of the virus.




 

Source: Read Full Article

Categories
Celebrities

Meghan Markle’s Mother Inspired Her Dedication to Charity Work

Meghan, Duchess of Sussex’s passion for philanthropy started long before her life as a royal.

According to People, Meghan’s mother, Doria Ragland, inspired the duchess to dedicate her time to charity work while growing up, and especially now as she continues her transition into post-royal life.

“Meghan didn’t have much when she was a child, but her mom made sure they always gave back,” a source told People. Per the outlet, Ragland was behind Meghan and Prince Harry’s decision to begin volunteering with Project Angel Food in Los Angeles, where the pair help deliver meals to sick individuals affected by the ongoing coronavirus crisis.

“[Meghan] said she wanted to do something to give back on Easter and was talking to her mom and her mom told her that Project Angel Food needs help and Meghan said, ‘Yes, brilliant,'” explained the executive director of Project Angel Food, Richard Ayoub.

Since the Sussexes’ relocation to Los Angeles late last month, the pair have been focused on spending time together as a family with their young son, Archie Mountbatten-Windsor, and step outside their home only to partake in charity work. In addition to volunteering with Project Angel Food, Meghan and Harry have video-called families and members of their royal patronages, as well as donated more than $100,000 in proceeds from their 2018 wedding broadcast to a U.K.–based food bank.

“My mother raised me to be a global citizen, with eyes open to sometimes harsh realities,” Meghan previously wrote on her now-defunct lifestyle blog, The Tig (per People). “Both my parents came from little, so they made a choice to give a lot—buying turkeys for homeless shelters at Thanksgiving, delivering meals to patients in hospice care, donating any spare change in their pocket to those asking for it, and performing quiet acts of grace—be it a hug, a smile, or a pat on the back to show ones in need that they would be alright.”

Source: Read Full Article

Categories
World News

Meghan and Harry biography bombshell for Royals

Meghan and Harry biography bombshell for Royals: Couple help two ‘friendly’ journalists write their Megxit story amid fears they’re out to settle scores

  • Duke & Duchess of Sussex have co-operated with authors of explosive new book
  • Fears it will also be a score-settling exercise with strained relationships revisited 
  • Sussexes gave interview to the authors before move to America, MoS learned

The Duke and Duchess of Sussex have co-operated with the authors of an explosive new book that risks inflicting further anguish on the Royal Family, it was claimed last night.

Palace insiders expect the biography – provisionally entitled Thoroughly Modern Royals: The Real World Of Harry And Meghan – to paint a flattering portrait of the couple.

But there are fears it will also be a score-settling exercise in which Harry and Meghan’s strained relationship with the Royal Family and painful decision to quit Britain are revisited in uncomfortable detail.

The Mail on Sunday has been told that before moving to North America, the privacy-obsessed Sussexes gave an interview to the book’s authors, both journalists. One of them, Omid Scobie, is an acknowledged Meghan cheerleader and was one of the favoured journalists given details of the couple’s video call to the Queen last week in which they wished her a happy 94th birthday.

Just days after the Sussexes cut off the press, MoS is told they’ve helped two ‘friendly’ journalists write their story


Planning biography: Omid Scobie and Carolyn Durand 

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle ‘give interviews to two journalists writing flattering biography about them entitled ‘Thoroughly Modern Royals’, which risks causing further anguish to Royal Family in bid to settle scores’ 

Biographer and journalist Omid Scobie planted his flag firmly in Meghan’s camp soon after she became linked to Harry. Having begun his journalistic career on the celebrity magazine Heat, British-Iranian Scobie had covered the Royals for a number of years and, say friends, was eager to boost his profile.

Aligning himself with a beautiful woman whose romance with Prince Harry was transfixing the world was one way of going about it.

Writing her biography one day would be another.

And so began his cultivation of Meghan, at first through her friends. Struggling to cope under intense media scrutiny after her wedding, the Duchess needed a journalist she could trust, a man whom she could rely on to fight her corner and not write nasty things. Scobie was happy to oblige and, perhaps unfairly and possibly through jealousy, was dubbed Meghan’s ‘mouthpiece’.

Anyone doubting where his allegiance lies, though, need only consider the fulsome piece he wrote for the Harper’s Bazaar website last month.

In it, he wrote of shadowing the Sussexes’ work, ‘getting to know the couple better through their humanitarian endeavours, engagements and overseas visits.’ He went on: ‘Their high-energy work ethic and passion for social justice attracted a new, more diverse demographic of royal watcher. As a young(ish), biracial royal correspondent, the change was exciting. And as their popularity grew around the world, so did a new golden era for the House of Windsor.’

Little wonder that he was one of the few favoured journalists invited to witness Meghan’s tearful farewell to staff at Buckingham Palace. In what must have delighted Meghan and Harry, he has written about the ‘almost daily mistruths’ of the British press.

Scobie teamed up with another Sussex-friendly journalist, Carolyn Durand. Well respected, she is a former producer with US broadcaster ABC and has covered the Royals for more than 15 years. Ms Durand now writes about the Royal Family for Elle magazine.

Scobie and Durand’s biography promises to tell the couple’s ‘real’ story. For that we must wait.

There are parallels with Princess Diana’s story. Like Meghan, she felt like a ‘prisoner in the palace’ and, desperate to express her torment, chose a biographer, Andrew Morton, to tell her story.

But unlike Scobie, there was nothing remotely ‘woke’ about Morton, a straight-talking Yorkshireman and seasoned Fleet Street operator.

Echoing Princess Diana’s secret involvement in the blockbuster biography, Diana: Her True Story, when she encouraged her friends to speak to author Andrew Morton, questions are being asked whether members of Meghan’s inner circle were being urged to help Scobie and his American co-author, Carolyn Durand.

The 320-page biography, due to be released on August 11, is expected to be a global bestseller.

Last week, Harry and Meghan launched an extraordinary broadside against the British media from their Hollywood hideout, announcing they would no longer ‘engage’ with certain newspapers in protest at the way they claim their lives are covered.

To the dismay of courtiers, the diatribe was issued on the eve of the Queen’s birthday and with the country paralysed by Covid-19.

News of the book comes as the first round of a legal dispute between the Duchess and The Mail on Sunday reached the High Court last week. The Duchess is suing this newspaper for publishing parts of a letter she sent to her estranged father, Thomas Markle, three months after he missed her wedding following a heart attack.

In court, claims that Mr Markle was harassed and exploited were disputed by Antony White QC for The Mail on Sunday.

He pointed out that it was ‘very curious’ the claims were ‘put on the record’ by the Duchess even though she had not contacted her father to see if he agreed with them and had not in fact spoken to him for two years.

According to sources, the book charts the Sussexes’ story from the outset of their romance. It was due to be published by New York-based Dey Street Books in June but was delayed, presumably because of the pandemic. While the publishers are keeping details of the biography under wraps, the ebook version is available to pre-order for £7.49.

Given the candour with which the Duke has spoken in recent months, those close to the Queen are concerned about what the couple might have divulged to the authors, both on and off the record. Earlier this year, the couple’s friend, ITV anchorman Tom Bradby, warned that a tell-all interview might irreparably damage a monarchy still reeling from Megxit and the scandal over Prince Andrew’s friendship with convicted paedophile Jeffrey Epstein. It was during Bradby’s own interview with the couple in southern Africa last autumn that Harry confessed to a rift with Prince William.

Meghan also faced the cameras and complained about the pressures of motherhood under the media spotlight. ‘Not many people have asked if I am okay,’ she told Bradby. ‘It’s a very real thing to be going through behind the scenes.’ She added: ‘I really tried to adopt this British sensibility of a stiff upper lip. I tried, I really tried. But I think that what that does internally is probably really damaging.’ Scobie, who writes about the Royals for Harper’s Bazaar website, and Durand, a former producer with US network ABC, began work on the project in the summer of 2018.

At the time, the Duchess was struggling with the realities of her new life and no longer enjoying the universal adulation generated by her wedding a few months earlier.

Revelations about the Duchess’s apparently high-handed manner were causing unease. It emerged that there had been a row between Harry and one of the Queen’s closest aides over the tiara the Duchess wanted to wear at her wedding.

Several tiaras had been considered, but the Queen did not want to lend the one Meghan preferred. Words were exchanged and Harry backed down.

Meanwhile, it was reported Meghan had complained about the mustiness of Windsor’s St George’s Chapel and wanted it sprayed with air freshener before the ceremony.

There was further trouble over the bridesmaids’ dresses, which was an early sign of the great tensions to come. It was reported that Meghan had reduced Kate, her soon-to-be sister-in-law, to tears, because of her manner.

Against this background of negative publicity, the authors launched their enquiries and, seeking assistance, approached the Palace. Some co-operation was given but it dried up after a few months.

Sources have said people began contacting the authors unbidden, anxious to set the record straight. It has been suggested that perhaps Meghan had become frustrated with the strictures of the Palace media operation. Just like Diana more than a quarter of a century earlier, she felt exposed and had decided to take control herself.

If all had gone to plan, the reputation management operation should have culminated in the book’s publication around the time of their son Archie’s birth last May, but it was delayed, quite possibly because of rapid developments in the couple’s life that the publishers wished to see chronicled.

For the authors, the extra time was a godsend. The following months brought a rich seam of new material. Unfolding before them was the high drama of Megxit, which deepened the rift between Harry and his brother and caused the Royal Family, particularly the Queen and Prince Charles, untold despair.

It is these still-festering wounds that the Palace fears the authors have picked over and have the potential to bring further upset.

It emerged that there had been a row between Harry and one of the Queen’s closest aides over the tiara the Duchess wanted to wear at her wedding

Any examination of the painful months leading to the couple’s decision to withdraw from Royal life is likely to focus on the break-up of the ‘Fab Four’ as the Royal brothers and their wives were dubbed.

Rumours of a rift began circulating when Harry and Meghan moved out of Kensington Palace and split their joint charitable venture.

The interview with ITV’s Tom Bradby came a few months later. Pouring forth their woes against a backdrop of some of the most deprived regions on Earth was widely seen as a mistake.

Since then, the couple have made numerous interventions, culminating in last week’s newspaper boycott. In January this year, Bradby said he had gleaned some insight into what a ‘tell-all interview’ might entail and it would ‘not be pretty’.

Harry remains sixth in line to the throne but his decision to pursue his own commercial interests means the Sussexes may no longer use their HRH titles.

At the historic Sandringham summit with the Queen in January, it was announced Harry and Meghan would forsake their Royal lives and seek their fortunes in America. They agreed not to enter into any deals which would bring the monarchy into disrepute.

Guiding the couple now are a team of mainly US professionals – a PR company, an agent, lawyer and business manager – who helped Meghan’s acting career. Already there have been several false steps. Palace aides had made it clear that due to the lockdown, the Queen would mark her birthday with calls from her family, but the details would remain private. Yet within moments of their video call from LA, Harry and Meghan instructed an aide to brief favoured journalists.

‘The Duke and Duchess of Sussex, along with Archie, have just held a video call with Her Majesty The Queen to wish her a happy birthday,’ tweeted one.

It was the latest in a series of unfortunate decisions taken by the couple while striving to build a new life outside of The Firm. Last month, for instance, Harry was publicly humiliated after being hoaxed by two Russian comics claiming to be teenage eco-warrior Greta Thunberg and her father.

Now believed to be staying in a gated community in Beverly Hills, the couple will be pitching for work – Meghan appeared on a US morning TV show last week to promote her voiceover for a Disney wildlife documentary about elephants.

Last night, Princess Diana’s former private secretary Patrick Jephson was scathing about the couple’s decision to grant an interview to Scobie and Durand.

‘Collaborating with pliable authors and magazine journalists while shunning those deemed awkward is standard Royal practice, but for Harry and Meghan it’s not just about image – for them it’s business: a vital part of the self-branding and marketing process,’ he said, writing in today’s Mail on Sunday.

Neither of the book’s authors was available for comment last night. Friends of the pair confirmed the book is scheduled for publication in August, subject to any last minute legal concerns.

No one from publishers Dey Street or parent company HarperCollins responded to calls.

Please stop riding on the coat-tails of the dutiful family you abandoned, Princess Diana’s former private secretary PATRICK JEPHSON urges Harry and Meghan to give up their ‘celebrity lives’

Patrick Jephson for the Mail on Sunday  

Viewers of a solidly unflashy American TV business show might have thought they’d tuned in to the wrong channel last Friday. With a straight face, the anchor reported that bookmakers were offering odds of 100-1 that Meghan Markle would be elected US President in 2024.

Perhaps the item was intended as light relief amid the Covid gloom, yet after a short discussion, the anchor and his studio panellists seriously conceded that she was an unlikely but not impossible future occupant of the White House.

‘Perhaps the first Duchess to become President’ was the concluding thought, although nobody mentioned the technicality that holders of American public office are banned from using foreign titles. Still, it’s quite an idea. President Meghan. It’s surely no more unlikely than the story of how Ms Markle became a Duchess. And why should her talents not carry her further? Giving up her grand Royal handle might be a small price to pay for a shot at being the first female holder of the world’s most powerful office.

But there are other, less fanciful, reasons for the Sussexes to shed their Royal status, as we shall see. While the image of President Markle waving regally from the steps of Air Force One will appeal to the Duchess’s many devotees, the current reality of her life with the exiled ‘Call Me Harry’ is rather less glorious.

With a straight face, the anchor reported that bookmakers were offering odds of 100-1 that Meghan Markle would be elected US President in 2024

Consider. Whatever their long term ambitions – and, to be sure, President and First Laddie are probably not top of the list – their new life in the world capital of make-believe presents as many challenges as opportunities, not least financial.

Some hard-nosed forensic journalist-accountants have calculated an income of £20 million as the minimum the Sussexes will need to pull in every 12 months if they are to keep up celebrity-Royal appearances. The figure could easily be far more and, even if the analysis is wrong by half, that’s still an awful lot of elephant voice-overs.

Granted, the couple do have other potential income streams they might tap: there’s the Apple deal with Oprah, possible further work with Disney and a rich seam of endorsements and influencer deals to mine.

PLUS, is anybody surprised that they’ve co-operated with a book due out this summer with, no doubt, numerous dollar-spinning spin-offs? Collaborating with pliable authors and magazine journalists while shunning those deemed awkward is standard Royal practice, but for Harry and Meghan it’s not just about image – for them it’s business: a vital part of the self-branding and marketing process.

Yet here is the crux of the Sussexes’ dilemma: to rake in the necessary celebrity dosh they must leverage their Royal status to the maximum. After all, what else do they have to offer in exchange for the big cheques and star treatment? As their recent letter of complaint to British newspaper editors makes clear, their flight to LA has not induced them to drop an ounce of Royal haughtiness, as their hapless spokesman blared out their Royal titles in every paragraph.

The point couldn’t have been clearer: we don’t care about losing the HRH – all we, and our Hollywood best friends, want to put on the invitation cards is the Duke and Duchess bit. The trouble for Meghan and Harry is that this is a spectacularly bad time to trade on a fraying Royal connection.

It may have been years since the Royal Family had a real chance to do their job as the heart and soul of the kingdom but by God and by the grace of Covid they have it now.

Never in living memory (for most of her subjects) has the Queen better embodied the modest optimism and quiet resolve that define the best of British character. Her family in turn have played their part to justified acclaim, none more applauded than the relatable, telegenic and just plain decent Cambridges.

It seems an age ago that Meghan and Harry joined William and Catherine to form the ‘Fab Four’ of young Royal stars, whose charisma, approachability and fundraising potential seemed limitless. And so it might have been. It’s not yet time to explore why so many dreams came to grief, though let’s hope once normality returns there will be a discreet inquest into such a failure of Royal management.

Meanwhile, the inevitable revelations and bloodletting of the forthcoming court battles the Sussexes have launched against the most popular sections of British media may provide plenty of material for us to ponder.

Such considerations look out of place in a country – and world – still in a fight for its life against the cruel virus. Yet into this drama of survival Meghan and Harry have chosen to blunder with their petty tales of unhappiness and hurt feelings.

They and their celebrity publicists aren’t stupid. They can see that exile in Tinseltown is not a clever place from which to lecture the people they have abandoned on how to endure the worst crisis since the Second World War. They invite – and have duly received – much sarcastic mockery for their clumsy attempts to appear relevant from their luxurious lockdown in La-La-Land.

THEY must surely sense how out of touch, even borderline desperate, they appear. Yet – and here they may deserve sympathy – they have no alternative. They are currently in the audition of their lives, aspiring to be the toast of Hollywood. But they have chosen a pitiless spotlight – the here today, gone tomorrow favours of the world’s most ruthless chattering class.

There are other, less fanciful, reasons for the Sussexes to shed their Royal status, as we shall see

Common sense – and decency – would compel the Sussexes to hunker down with their baby in the temporary comfort of a borrowed mansion and hope the rest of us wouldn’t notice their period of wise invisibility. But they dare not, because to be invisible and un-royal now is to fail the audition. And that, they simply can’t afford. So expect plenty more ham-fisted paparazzi photo opportunities as they dole out supplies to deserving Hollywood Covid sufferers; be ready for more insights on the British response to the pandemic from the poolside prince; stand by for more plaintive screeds on the iniquities of the British media. This is just the jam the Sussexes have got themselves into and, like so much else that has befallen them, it is of their own doing.

So if we wish them success in their new adventure in the world’s entertainment capital, we must help them cast off ties to the institution and country they seem to think they’ve outgrown. Now, surely, is the time to unburden them from the stress of being half-celebrity, half-toxic Royal.

Their attempts to ride on the coat-tails of the hard-working family they have abandoned do nobody any good. In April 2020, real royalty isn’t Instagramming from Malibu but working here, among crowded hospitals and deserted streets. This is where historic Royal titles are earned and re-earned, and this is where Harry and Meghan must leave theirs. For their own good – and for the good of the Crown they claim to serve.

Far better not to look back in anger but concentrate instead on thriving in their new surroundings. And what better ambition to set themselves than the White House. Long odds at 100-1?

Ms Markle may indeed now settle for the life of quiet privacy she and Harry have said they want. But don’t bet on it.

 

Source: Read Full Article

Categories
World News

‘Die-hard’ Meghan Markle and Prince Harry fan Judge Rinder turns on ‘me, me’ couple for ‘using the press’ – The Sun

JUDGE Rinder has turned on Meghan Markle and Prince Harry for "using the press," after the couple announced they would no longer cooperate with certain British newspapers.

The Duke and Duchess of Sussex said they would no longer deal with The Sun, the Daily Mail, the Daily Express and the Daily Mirror.


The pair told the four papers and their online outlets they are ceasing all co-operation because of "distorted, false or invasive" stories.

Under the revised media policy, Harry and Meghan's press team will not even answer calls from the papers.

'NO COINCIDENCE'

Speaking on This Morning, Judge Rinder – whose real name is Robert – said: "I've been for a long time one of the last die-hard defenders of Meghan and Harry and certainly Meghan.

"Just to be clear, the timing of this is no coincidence."

The legal professional explained: "They are, for anybody who are court geeks as I am, they will know they are about to have a hearing in a case they're bringing against the newspapers.

"This stuff would have emerged so they are strategically putting their evidence into the public sphere.

I'm afraid to say it's harder to think of a more clear articulation, a split, between a generation that is 'me me, enough about me what you do think of me?' where you accidentally use the press when you want them, but get rid of them when you don't.

"I'm afraid to say it's harder to think of a more clear articulation, a split, between a generation that is 'me me, enough about me what you do think of me?' where you accidentally use the press when you want them, but get rid of them when you don't."

Meghan and Harry have recently been spotted delivering food packages in LA to residents in need during the coronavirus crisis.

They donned face masks as they delivered free meals in West Hollywood for charity Project Angel Food around their new city.

Judge Rinder, real name Robert, added: "You find yourself photographed delivering food to the poor – one wonders how that happened? – vis a vis the service and the sacrifice of our Queen, whose birthday it is today, and other royals.

"It's becoming increasingly difficult to defend their position."

LEGAL BATTLE LAUNCHED

Prior to stepping down from the royal family, Meghan and Harry launched an attack on the UK's newspapers in a dedicated media section on their new website Sussexroyal.com.

The couple, who said they will be adopting a "revised media approach" from the spring, criticised Britain's royal correspondents and said they would no longer participate in the "royal rota" system which has been used by Buckingham Palace for decades.

Meghan is involved in legal action against Associated Newspapers, publisher of the Mail On Sunday and MailOnline, over an article which reproduced parts of the handwritten letter sent to Thomas Markle, 75, in August 2018.

Harry described the media as a "powerful force" in an emotional speech just a day after saying he and his wife would be stepping back from royal duties.

LETTER IN FULL

As The Duke and Duchess of Sussex now settle into the next chapter of their lives and no longer receive any publicly funded support, we are writing to set a new media relations policy, specifically as it pertains to your organisation.

Like you, The Duke and Duchess of Sussex believe that a free press is a cornerstone to any democracy – particularly in moments of crisis.

At its best, this free press shines light on dark places, telling stories that would otherwise go untold, standing up for what's right, challenging power, and holding those who abuse the system to account.

It has been said that journalism's first obligation is to the truth. The Duke and Duchess of Sussex agree wholeheartedly.

It is gravely concerning that an influential slice of the media, over many years, has sought to insulate themselves from taking accountability for what they say or print – even when they know it to be distorted, false, or invasive beyond reason.

When power is enjoyed without responsibility, the trust we all place in this much-needed industry is degraded. There is a real human cost to this way of doing business and it affects every corner of society.

The Duke and Duchess of Sussex have watched people they know – as well as complete strangers – have their lives completely pulled apart for no good reason, other than the fact that salacious gossip boosts advertising revenue.

With that said, please note that The Duke and Duchess of Sussex will not be engaging with your outlet.

There will be no corroboration and zero engagement.

This is also a policy being instated for their communications team, in order to protect that team from the side of the industry that readers never see. This policy is not about avoiding criticism.

It's not about shutting down public conversation or censoring accurate reporting. Media have every right to report on and indeed have an opinion on The Duke and Duchess of Sussex, good or bad.

But it can't be based on a lie. They also want to be very clear: this is not in any way a blanket policy for all media.

The Duke and Duchess of Sussex are looking forward to working with journalists and media organisations all over the world, engaging with grassroots media, regional and local media, and young, up-and-coming journalists, to spotlight issues and causes that so desperately need acknowledging.

And they look forward to doing whatever they can to help further opportunities for more diverse and underrepresented voices, who are needed now more than ever.

What they won't do is offer themselves up as currency for an economy of clickbait and distortion. We are encouraged that this new approach will be heard and respected.

Source: Read Full Article

Categories
World News

Meghan Markle brands her father a liar

Meghan Markle brands her father a liar and DENIES knowing that her closest friends would give interview criticizing Thomas Markle and revealing their relationship breakdown in run-up to Royal wedding

  • Text messages revealed in new court documents claim the Duke and Duchess of Sussex tried to protect Thomas Markle in the days leading up to their wedding
  • The Duchess of Sussex also states Thomas Markle did not answer truthfully when asked if had colluded with a photographer to stage pictures of him 
  • The revelations come in documents submitted to the Royal Courts of Justice for the High Court hearing between Duchess of Sussex and Associated Newspapers

Meghan Markle has branded her father a liar and denied she knew her influential friends planned to reveal details of her deteriorating relationship with him to an American magazine, new court papers have revealed.

Text messages revealed in new court documents claim the Duke and Duchess of Sussex tried to protect Thomas Markle in the days leading up to their wedding while he was forced to drop out of the lavish Windsor Castle wedding due to his failing health.

The Duchess of Sussex also states Thomas Markle did not answer truthfully when asked if had colluded with a photographer to stage pictures of him in the weeks leading up to the 19 May 2018 ceremony.

The 37-year-old actress also maintains she was unaware that five close friends had chosen to intervene in the growing public debate about her relationship with her father by giving interviews to People magazine for an article published in February 2019.

The Duke and Duchess of Sussex leaving the Commonwealth Service at Westminster Abbey, London on Commonwealth Day, on March 9 this year

The revelations come in new documents submitted to the Royal Courts of Justice for the High Court hearing this Friday between the Duchess of Sussex and the Associated Newspapers.

The Duchess alleges invasion of privacy, breach of copyright and misuse of personal data over the publication of excerpts of a letter to her father about his treatment of her in February 2019. The Mail on Sunday argues that as a member of the royal family the Duchess did not have a reasonable expectation of privacy and that that there was no agreement with Thomas Markle that the letter should remain private.

The series of text messages from Prince Harry and his bride-to-be Meghan Markle reveal how they questioned Thomas Markle’s reason for dropping out of wedding but continued to offer him protection and urged him not to talk to the press.

In one message Prince Harry says; ‘If u love Meg and want to make it right please call me’, and in another Meghan says; ‘Very concerned about your health and safety’.

Meghan Markle pictured with her father Thomas Markle. Text messages revealed in new court documents claim the Duke and Duchess of Sussex tried to protect Thomas Markle in the days leading up to their wedding

But Thomas Markle feels aggrieved, saying; ‘I’m sorry my heart attack is there any inconvenience for you’.

The papers submitted today by the Duchess’ legal team also state: ‘Mr Markle did not answer truthfully when asked about the photographs taken and staged by a paparazzo photographer…

‘Despite discovering that he had not told her the truth, with all the distress this caused her, the Claimant [Duchess of Sussex] was still focused on finding a way for him to travel to London safely [for her wedding], and the Claimant [Duchess of Sussex] tried to reassure her father that there was no ill feeling between them.’

The papers also maintain Meghan Markle’s position that she did not know that five of her closest and most influential friends had agreed to give interviews to People magazine, a US celebrity publication, to fight her corner in the growing public debate about her relationship with her father.

Thomas Markle showing souvenirs he keeps on mantle of Harry and Meghan during the Channel 5 documentary called Thomas Markle: My Story Channel, that aired earlier this year

The documents revealed how her friends discovered Duchess of Sussex was distressed during visits to her London, but Meghan Markle states she had no idea they were going to speak out on her behalf on the issue of her father.

That article published on 18 February 2019 referred to bitter and heart-felt letters exchanged between Meghan Markle and her father Thomas.

The documents state: ‘It is admitted that People magazine, a US title, published articles based on interviews given by five unnamed friends of the Claimant in its 18 February 2019 hard copy and online edition and that these interviews contained the text quoted therein.

‘It is further admitted that in the course of these lengthy articles, a brief and passing reference was made to the Letter (as well as the response from the Claimant’s [Duchess of Sussex] father [Thomas Markle].

‘This reference was neither the main focus nor any substantial part of the articles.

‘Further, it did not contain the detailed contents of the Letter and insofar as it purported to summarise the Letter and the Claimant’s [Duchess of Sussex] purpose in sending it was completely wrong.’

The papers reveal that whilst the Duchess appreciated that her close friends were concerned and distressed at the media coverage about her and were trying to help she had no idea they had planned to give interviews to People magazine.

A picture of Meghan Markle and Thomas Markle that appeared on the Channel 5 documentary that aired in January this year called, Thomas Markle: My Story

The documents state: ‘In fact, the Claimant [Duchess of Sussex] did not know that a number of her friends agreed to give an interview about her to People magazine.

‘As she later discovered, following visits to see her in London at the beginning of 2019, some of her close circle of friends became extremely concerned at the aggressive attacks upon her in the media and the palpable and profound impact which this was having upon her, especially as she was vulnerable as well as heavily pregnant at the time.

‘As a result, one of her closest friends decided that they should help by arranging to give anonymous interviews to this American magazine whose Editor was a very good friend of hers in which they might explain what

the Claimant [Duchess of Sussex] was truly like (as opposed to the tabloid portrayal of her).’

The latest court papers also reveal how the Duke and Duchess of Sussex still tried to help and protect Thomas Markle despite the growing chasm between them in the lead up to the wedding at Windsor Castle on 19 Mary 2018, in a series of texts.

The messages reveal how Prince Harry urged Mr Markle to stop engaging with journalists and photographers for the love of his daughter and warned him contacting the press would ‘backfire’.

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle visited Canada House, in London,  on January 7 this year

On 14th May, five days before the wedding and days after Thomas Markle was exposed for colluding with the paparazzo photographer staging photographs he sent a text to his daughter Meghan confirming he would not be attending her wedding.

The documents state: ‘It is correct that on 14 May 2018, Mr Markle did send the claimant [Duchess of Sussex] a text message to apologise and confirm that he would not be attending the wedding, and approximately 30 minutes later (after several calls to him went unanswered) the Claimant’s husband [Duke of Sussex] sent a message to Mr Markle from the Claimant’s [Meghan’s] telephone.

The Duke of Sussex wrote: ‘Tom, Harry again! Really need to speak to u.

‘U do not need to apologize (sic), we understand the circumstances but ‘going public’ will only make the situation worse.

‘If u love Meg and want to make it right please call me as there are two other options which don’t involve u having to speak to the media, who incidentally created this whole situation.

‘So please call me so I can explain. Meg and I are not angry, we just need to speak to u. Thanks.

‘Oh any speaking to the press WILL backfire, trust me Tom. Only we can help u, as we have been trying from day 1.’

On 14th May, after receiving Prince Harry’s text, Thomas Markle issued a public statement through celebrity news website TMZ to say he was going to hospital after suffering a heart attack.

Thomas Markle with a baby Meghan Markle. A picture shown in the Channel 5 documentary called Thomas Markle: My Story, that aired earlier this year

The Duchess responded to the news in text messages to her father asking about his health and offering protection that went unanswered, the court documents reveal.

On 15 May 2018, four days before the wedding, she wrote: ‘I’ve been reaching out to you all weekend but you’re not taking any of our calls or replying to any texts … Very concerned about your health and safety and have taken every measure to protect you but not sure what more we can do if you don’t respond … Do you need help? Can we send the security team down again? I’m very sorry to hear you’re in the hospital but need you to please get in touch with us … What hospital are you at?’

After not hearing back from her father The Duchess of Sussex followed up this text about ten minutes later saying that she and Harry had decided to send the security anyway.

She wrote: ‘Harry and I made a decision earlier today and are dispatching the same security guys you turned away this weekend to be a presence on the ground to make sure you’re safe… they will be there at your disposal as soon as you need them. Please please call as soon as you can.. all of this is incredibly concerning but your health is most important’.

Mr Markle responded to this simply saying he would be in hospital for a few days and was okay but refused the offer of security, the documents reveal.

They state: ‘While Mr Markle responded later that evening to say that he appreciated the offer but did not feel in danger and would instead recover at a motel, the Claimant responded 10 minutes later to make a further request for the hospital details so that she would know where he was.’

The defence document filed by Associated Newspapers sets out that Mr Markle underwent emergency heart surgery on May 16, 2018, and that he texted his daughter on the same day to let her know he would not be able to attend the wedding as his doctors would not allow him to fly.

The document states: ‘He told the claimant he loved her and wished her the best.

‘He sent a follow-up message asking who would ‘be giving [her] away?’ and saying that if she really needed him he would come, and that he was sorry ‘about all this’.

Meghan Markle, as a teenager, pictured with father Thomas Markle. The image was shown in the Channel 5 documentary called Thomas Markle: My Story, that aired earlier this year

‘In response, he received a text response signed ‘Love M and H’, but which read as if it was from Prince Harry, (amongst other things) admonishing Mr Markle for talking to the press and telling him to stop, and accusing Mr Markle of causing hurt to his daughter.

‘The text did not ask how the surgical procedure had gone or how Mr Markle was or send him good wishes.

‘Mr Markle was deeply hurt and responded with a curt message: ‘I’ve done nothing to hurt you Meghan or anyone else I know nothing about 20 phone calls I’m sorry my heart attack is there any inconvenience for you’, and a couple more short messages.’

The Duke of Sussex was so concerned by this message that he questioned Thomas Markle whether the message was really from him.

On 16 May 2018, three days before the wedding he wrote: ‘Tom, it’s Harry, please answer your phone. I need to know this is actually you because it doesn’t sound like you at all.’

The documents stated: ‘It is admitted and averred that following this unpleasant message (which she [Duchess of Sussex] was unsure came from her father [Thomas Markle]), her repeated telephone calls to him, his failure to pick up the phone to her many calls or even respond to the message to him from the Claimant’s husband [Duke of Sussex] pleading with him to do so, the Claimant [Duchess of Sussex] did not speak to her father before her wedding, which took place shortly after on 19 May [2018].’

Thomas Markle finally called his daughter on the morning of her wedding, but the 4.57am phone call on 19 May 2018 went unanswered and father and daughter have not spoken since, legal documents have revealed.

The hearing will take place by video conference on Friday. 

The text messages between Prince Harry and Thomas Markle

12th May 2018: Thomas Markle is exposed for colluding with a paparazzo photographer to stage pictures ahead of his daughter Meghan’s televised wedding to Prince Harry at Windsor Castle in seven days.

14th May 2018: Thomas Markle sends Meghan a sent a text confirming he would not be attending her wedding.

14th May 2018: Prince Harry sends Thomas Markle a text urging him not to speak to the press.

Prince Harry wrote: ‘Tom, Harry again! Really need to speak to u.

‘U do not need to apologize (sic), we understand the circumstances but ‘going public’ will only make the situation worse.

‘If u love Meg and want to make it right please call me as there are two other options which don’t involve u having to speak to the media, who incidentally created this whole situation.

‘So please call me so I can explain. Meg and I are not angry, we just need to speak to u. Thanks.

‘Oh any speaking to the press WILL backfire, trust me Tom. Only we can help u, as we have been trying from day 1.’

14th May 2018: Thomas Markle does not reply to the text but issues a public statement via celebrity news website TMZ to say he was going to hospital after suffering a heart attack.

15th May 2018: Meghan Markle responds to the news in text messages to her father asking about his health and offering protection.

Meghan Markle wrote: ‘I’ve been reaching out to you all weekend but you’re not taking any of our calls or replying to any texts … Very concerned about your health and safety and have taken every measure to protect you but not sure what more we can do if you don’t respond … Do you need help? Can we send the security team down again? I’m very sorry to hear you’re in the hospital but need you to please get in touch with us … What hospital are you at?’

15th May 2018: Meghan Markle followed up this text about ten minutes later saying that she and Harry had decided to send the security despite not getting a response.

Meghan Markle wrote: ‘Harry and I made a decision earlier today and are dispatching the same security guys you turned away this weekend to be a presence on the ground to make sure you’re safe… they will be there at your disposal as soon as you need them. Please please call as soon as you can.. all of this is incredibly concerning but your health is most important’.

15th May 2018: Thomas Markle responds by simply saying he would be in hospital for a few days and was okay but refused the offer of security, the documents reveal.

16th May 2018: Thomas Markle undergoes emergency heart surgery and texts daughter Meghan the same day to let her know he would not be able to attend the wedding as his doctors would not allow him to fly.

16th May 2018: Prince Harry sends a text urging Thomas Markle not to talk to the press, and signed ‘Love M and H’.

16th May 2018: Thomas Markle is deeply hurt and sends curt message.

Thomas Markle wrote: ‘I’ve done nothing to hurt you Meghan or anyone else I know nothing about 20 phone calls I’m sorry my heart attack is there any inconvenience for you’.

16th May 2018: Prince Harry questions the text is really from Thomas Markle.

Prince Harry wrote: ‘Tom, it’s Harry, please answer your phone. I need to know this is actually you because it doesn’t sound like you at all.’

19th May 2018: Wedding Day Windsor Castle. Thomas Markle calls Meghan at 4.57am but the call goes unanswered. Father and daughter have not spoken since.

Source: Read Full Article

Categories
Celebrities

Meghan Markle & Prince Harry Send Stern Final Warning to British Tabloids: Get Out of Our Lives!

It’s been a tough month for Prince Harry and Meghan Markle.

Actually, it’s been a though month for all of humanity, but since the Duke and Duchess of Sussex are hoping to make a name for themselves as global humanitarian heroes, their failure to rise to the occasion has made this a doubly difficult time.

Much has been made of Harry and Meghan’s decision to move to Los Angeles from Vancouver at a time when most Americans were afraid to move from their living rooms.

Shortly thereafter, the couple announced plans to rename their charity, but revealed that the organization will be inactive until such time as the pandemic has subsided.

Many pointed out that the Sussexes seem to be missing the point of charitable organizations.

The couple took another hit today thanks to Harry’s latest comments about the coronavirus, which many feel serve to downplay the severity of the health crisis.

The litany of questionable decisions led to some seriously bad press, and these days, Harry and Meghan are struggling to rebuild their public image.

They’re taking a two-pronged approach to the problem, by getting involved in coronavirus relief efforts and sending a message to media outlets who might take the opportunity to kick them while they’re down.

On Saturday, the Sussexes delivered food to residents in need in LA’s West Hollywood neighborhood.

On Sunday, they issued the following, strongly worded message to several UK tabloids:

It is gravely concerning that an influential slice of the media, over many years, has sought to insulate themselves from taking accountability for what they say or print – even when they know it to be distorted, false, or invasive beyond reason.

“When power is enjoyed without responsibility, the trust we all place in this much-needed industry is degraded.

“There is a real human cost to this way of doing business and it affects every corner of society.

“The Duke and Duchess of Sussex have watched people they know – as well as complete strangers – have their lives completely pulled apart for no good reason, other than the fact that salacious gossip boosts advertising revenue.

The letter — which was sent to editors of the Sun, the Daily Mail, the Mirror and the Express — goes on to say that Harry and Meghan will no longer engage with these publications in a civil fashion:

“With that said, please note that the Duke and Duchess of Sussex will not be engaging with your outlet. There will be no corroboration and zero engagement.

“This is also a policy being instated for their communications team, in order to protect that team from the side of the industry that readers never see.

“This policy is not about avoiding criticism. It’s not about shutting down public conversation or censoring accurate reporting.

“Media have every right to report on and indeed have an opinion on the Duke and Duchess of Sussex, good or bad. But it can’t be based on a lie.”

Obviously, this is not the first the Sussexes have locked horns with the British tabloid press.

In October of last year, Harry and Meghan sued the Daily Mail and issued a strongly-worded rebuke of the newspaper’s practices.

“Unfortunately, my wife has become one of the latest victims of a British tabloid press that wages campaigns against individuals with no thought to the consequences – a ruthless campaign that has escalated over the past year, throughout her pregnancy and while raising our newborn son,” Harry said at the time.

It’s possible that this latest doubling-down is paving the way for a second lawsuit.

Either way, it seems Harry and Meghan are through playing games with the outlets that believe to be guilty of full-blown slander.

Knowing the British tabloid press, this situation is likely to get far worse before it gets any better.

Meghan Markle and Prince Harry are Here to Answer ALL Your Royal Separation QuestionsStart Gallery

Source: Read Full Article

Categories
World News

Harry and Meghan say they will never talk to four UK newspapers groups

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle announce they will refuse to talk to four UK newspaper groups – but claim the unprecedented move is ‘not about avoiding criticism’

  • Duke and Duchess of Sussex will have ‘zero engagement’ with UK tabloids  
  • The statement was made in a letter sent to editors of the British press on Sunday 
  • Prince Harry and Meghan say they refuse to ‘offer themselves up as currency’
  • Couple will not speak to the Daily Mail, Daily Mirror, The Sun or Daily Express
  • Ban also extends to the sister stablemates of those titles and to their websites 

The Duke and Duchess of Sussex have announced they will no longer respond to enquiries from journalists at four British newspaper groups because they are adopting a ‘zero engagement’ policy – but insist it is not a move aimed at ‘avoiding criticism’.

In a letter released to the Guardian on Sunday night, Los Angeles-based Prince Harry and Meghan say they will never again speak to publications including the Daily Mail, the Daily Mirror, The Sun or the Daily Express.

The couple’s letter details how their self-imposed ban on contact with a large portion of the British media is a refusal to ‘offer themselves up’.

Harry and Meghan are seen in LA last week delivering meals to needy residents during the coronavirus lockdown

They say they accept that media have ‘every right’ to report on the high-profile ex-royals, but claim: ‘This policy is not about avoiding criticism. It’s not about shutting down public conversation or censoring accurate reporting.

‘Like you, The Duke and Duchess of Sussex believe that a free press is a cornerstone to any democracy – particularly in moments of crisis. At its best, this free press shines light on dark places, telling stories that would otherwise go untold, standing up for what’s right, challenging power, and holding those who abuse the system to account.’

‘It has been said that journalism’s first obligation is to the truth. The Duke and Duchess of Sussex agree wholeheartedly.’

The announcement came hours after Prince Harry was criticised for claiming the UK’s Covid-19 crisis is not as bad as the public are being told.

In an interview with the Declassifed podcast, the 35-year-old said that things here are ‘better than we are led to believe through ­certain corners of the media’.

But his comments were branded ‘outrageous’ by expert Professor Karol Sikora, who asked: ‘What are his qualifications for making these comments — other than deserting his country in its hour of need?’

The Sussexes delivered the parcels as part of their work for the non-profit organisation Project Angel Food

The Duke and Duchess of Sussex have said they will no longer respond to enquiries from journalists at British tabloids. Pictured with son Archie Mountbatten-Windsor during a royal tour of South Africa, September 25, 2019

Daily Express

Daily Mail

Daily Mirror 

express.co.uk 

Mail on Sunday

MailOnline 

mirror.co.uk 

Sunday Express 

Sunday Mirror

Sunday People 

The Sun

The Sun on Sunday

thesun.co.uk

In the letter, which was sent to editors of the groups involved on Sunday evening, Harry and Meghan say: ‘Please note that the Duke and Duchess of Sussex will not be engaging with your outlet. There will be no corroboration and zero engagement.’

Accepting that media have ‘every right’ to report on the high-profile ex-royals, the letter explains: ‘This policy is not about avoiding criticism. It’s not about shutting down public conversation or censoring accurate reporting.

‘Media have every right to report on The Duke and Duchess of Sussex, good or bad. But it can’t be based on a lie.

‘They also want to be very clear: this is not in any way a blanket policy for all media.’  

The strongly worded letter then goes on to suggest that British tabloids have been responsible for publishing ‘salacious gossip’ which they know to be ‘distorted, false, or invasive beyond reason’.    

Prince Harry and Meghan claim they will never speak to publications including The Daily Mail, Mirror, The Sun or Express, again. Pictured at WellChild Awards in London on October 15, 2019

The Duke and Duchess of Sussex’s letter to Britain’s Tabloids 

Sent to editors of British newspapers including The Daily Mail, Mirror, The Sun or Express:

‘As the Duke and Duchess of Sussex now settle into the next chapter of their lives and no longer receive any publicly funded support, we are writing to set a new media relations policy, specifically as it pertains to your organisation.

Like you, The Duke and Duchess of Sussex believe that a free press is a cornerstone to any democracy – particularly in moments of crisis. At its best, this free press shines light on dark places, telling stories that would otherwise go untold, standing up for what’s right, challenging power, and holding those who abuse the system to account. 

It has been said that journalism’s first obligation is to the truth. The Duke and Duchess of Sussex agree wholeheartedly.

It is gravely concerning that an influential slice of the media, over many years, has sought to insulate themselves from taking accountability for what they say or print – even when they know it to be distorted, false, or invasive beyond reason. When power is enjoyed without responsibility, the trust we all place in this much needed industry is degraded. 

There is a real human cost to this way of doing business and it affects every corner of society.

The Duke and Duchess of Sussex have watched people they know – as well as complete strangers – have their lives completely pulled apart for no good reason, other than the fact that salacious gossip boosts advertising revenue. 

With that said, please note that The Duke and Duchess of Sussex will not be engaging with your outlet. There will be no corroboration and zero engagement. This is also a policy being instated for their communications team, in order to protect that team from the side of the industry that readers never see.

This policy is not about avoiding criticism. It’s not about shutting down public conversation or censoring accurate reporting. Media have every right to report on The Duke and Duchess of Sussex, good or bad. But it can’t be based on a lie. They also want to be very clear: this is not in any way a blanket policy for all media.

The Duke and Duchess of Sussex are looking forward to working with journalists and media organisations all over the world, engaging with grassroots media, regional and local media, and young, and up-and-coming journalists, to spotlight issues and causes that so desperately need acknowledging. And they look forward to doing whatever they can to help further opportunities for more diverse and underrepresented voices, who are needed now more than ever.

What they won’t do is offer themselves up as currency for an economy of clickbait and distortion.

We are encouraged that this new approach will be heard and respected.’

Meghan is due to face The Mail on Sunday in court, in a virtual hearing on Friday, over the publishing of a letter she wrote to her estranged father Thomas Markle and Prince Harry has launched separate legal claims against The Sun and The Mirror for alleged historic phone hacking.

Their direct address to the press comes just three weeks after the couple completed their last royal duty, on March 31, before stepping away from the monarchy and dropping their HRH styles and for a life mostly in North America.  

In the letter the pair praise the work of the media as a ‘cornerstone to any democracy’ that ‘shines light on dark places, telling stories that would otherwise go untold, standing up for what’s right, challenging power, and holding those who abuse the system to account’.

However they state that they have found the actions of an ‘influential slice of the media’ gravely concerning, adding that they believe there is a ‘human cost’.

Both Prince Harry and Meghan say they have ‘watched people they know – as well as complete strangers – have their lives completely pulled apart for no good reason’ by the media. 

The Duke and Duchess of Sussex and Duke and Duchess of Cambridge with the Princess Royal (left to right), watch the RAF flypast from Buckingham Palace, July 10, 2018

Prince William, Kate, Prince Harry, Meghan, and Princess Anne attend the wedding ceremony of Britain’s Princess Eugenie of York to Jack Brooksbank at St George’s Chapel, Windsor Castle October 12, 2018

Writing directly to the editors of Britain’s tabloids the ex-royals state: ‘Please note that the Duke and Duchess of Sussex will not be engaging with your outlet.

‘There will be no corroboration and zero engagement. This is also a policy being instated for their communications team, in order to protect that team from the side of the industry that readers never see.’ 

Representatives for The Sussex’s added that the ‘zero engagement policy’ would extend to both the Sunday paper and Online editions of each tabloid. 

In one final statement the letter concludes: ‘We are encouraged that this new approach will be heard and respected.’ 

Prince Harry, Duke of Sussex and Meghan, Duchess of Sussex and their baby son Archie Mountbatten-Windsor at a meeting with Archbishop Desmond Tutu in Cape Town, South Africa, September 2019

Communications for the couple will now be handled by Sunshine Sachs, a New York based PR firm, with only one UK based representative.

The hard-nosed Manhattan PR company is known for specialising in ‘crisis communications’ for celebrities. 

It has previously worked for Hollywood royalty including Leonardo DiCaprio, Natalie Portman, Bette Midler, Barbra Streisand, Jennifer Lopez and Michael Jackson’s family.

It is not yet known which media outlets will continue to have contact with the Sussexes, but the letter details how the pair ‘look forward’ to engaging with ‘grassroots, regional and local press’ to further causes that ‘desperately need acknowledging’.  

Source: Read Full Article